
In "Rich Media, Poor Democracy," communications scholar
Bob McChesney wrote about how democracy tends to be the first casualty in the collision of big media and big money. As keynote speaker at the Nov. 3
Citizen Media Forum put on by
Twin Cities Media Alliance, he continued the theme in a discussion about "journalism's freefall" and the challenges and triumphs of the fledgling media reform movement, which has grown exponentially since he founded its top advocacy group,
Free Press, in 2002. One of the biggest feathers in the movement's cap is the massive public campaign in 2003 that stalled the Federal Communications Commission's attempt to relax media ownership rules. Another is the halting of attempts to ban "
network neutrality," the policy that ensures all web users get the same level of access as anyone else.
But both of these successes are again threatened. Under new chair
Kevin Martin, the FCC is scrambling to relax longstanding rules governing media consolidation. It announced,
with only one week's notice, that the final public hearing on media ownership will be held in Seattle this Friday, Nov. 9. By year's end, the Commission may change the provision that prevents the same company from owning both a TV station and newspaper in the same town. And net neutrality remains under fire, thanks to the telecommunications and cable industries that want to replace an equal-access Internet with a two-tiered scheme that McChesney calls a "fast lane" and a "dirt path."
On Saturday, he spent a few minutes discussing these important policy crises and their impact on democracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment