So: is American bipartisanship real in a legislative sense?
No, according to the Darfur Scorecard, run by the nonpartisan Genocide Intervention Network. It ranked every member of the House and Senate based on factors including votes on bills that could affect change in Darfur, from the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act to measures seeking to increase humanitarian aid. In the Senate, those with the highest scores were overwhelmingly Democrats and those with the worst were Republicans.Eight of 10 members who received F scores were Republican, and congressional members receiving grades D through F outnumbered Democrats by 164 to 14. On the other hand, politicians with scores of A and A+ were also mostly Democrats: 120 Democrats versus 19 Republicans (independents Joe Lieberman and Bernie Sanders are also in this group).
In Minnesota, however, Senators Norm Coleman and Mark Dayton both scored As. In the House, Republicans Gil Gutknecht and John Kline bottomed the rankings with Ds. Topping the list were Betty McCollum with an A+ and Oberstar with an A.
Partisanship, of course, isn't the issue: change for the civilians suffering in Darfur is. It's been more than two years since George W. Bush announced that "The world cannot ignore the suffering of more than one million people" in Darfur. As more than 1000 faith communities across the country are now observing a prayer weekend for Darfur, plan to check back here for Darfur news and analysis on whether the 110th Congress and its majority Democrats can do what the Republican House and Senate didn't--bring relief to civilians in Darfur.
[Cross-posted at Minnesota Monitor. Image via the American Refugee Committee's Darfur Project.]