tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post331259423162796568..comments2024-02-23T20:05:42.671-06:00Comments on Eyeteeth: Incisive ideas: In the age of derivatives, reasserting an original: John Yang's “Blindman's Bluff”Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-45878255553543836982011-08-18T19:41:46.236-05:002011-08-18T19:41:46.236-05:00Shame shame on Anonymous for the drive-by smear. S...Shame shame on Anonymous for the drive-by smear. Seems like Eyeteeth did due diligence. It's the yellow-bellied Anonymous, who offers no actual facts, who's being one-sided. <br /><br />BJ Lieberman, PaducahAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-2729924870503852012011-07-25T10:01:11.962-05:002011-07-25T10:01:11.962-05:00Let's see: You seem to get the bio of the arti...Let's see: You seem to get the bio of the artist right, you attributed the claim about Sigur Ros' possible copyright infringement to Naomi Yang, you credited all photos. Can't see what the problem is with Anony-mouse. Probably some fan, or maybe the band's manager, who can't believe Sigur Ros might've neglected to respect another artist. <br /><br />Your one error, Paul: Feeding the trolls.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-42931624496521736912011-07-25T09:34:02.320-05:002011-07-25T09:34:02.320-05:00Ha.
Have courage, Anonymous: provide details to ...Ha. <br /><br />Have courage, Anonymous: provide details to back your insult, and use your real name.Paul Schmelzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06876791601014759949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-81892575729445595642011-07-25T06:20:40.965-05:002011-07-25T06:20:40.965-05:00Shame, shame, shame on you Paul for not researchin...Shame, shame, shame on you Paul for not researching all of the details before posting this. Or should I just congratulate you for being a typical one sided journalist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-44227276716586123182011-07-20T12:20:55.651-05:002011-07-20T12:20:55.651-05:00Great story - but how SLEAZY of Sigur Ros. Yes, th...Great story - but how SLEAZY of Sigur Ros. Yes, they used the image for marketing. That's not fair use by any definition. They owe the estate. Grrr.Clea Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10810838253598050028noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-85389903531983673612011-07-20T10:07:07.182-05:002011-07-20T10:07:07.182-05:00Also, you're welcome, Erik, and thanks for the...Also, you're welcome, Erik, and thanks for the note!Paul Schmelzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06876791601014759949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-33976398178166926372011-07-20T10:06:44.101-05:002011-07-20T10:06:44.101-05:00I should add that some may claim the use of the so...I should add that some may claim the use of the source image should be considered fair use, but given that the stencil appeared on packaging for an item for sale, it seems doubtful the band would have a good case if sued for copyright infringement. The case of Shepard Fairey selling Obama/HOPE posters based on an AP photographer's work is a good example of how that could go down.Paul Schmelzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06876791601014759949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-63876763589294329282011-07-20T08:38:17.112-05:002011-07-20T08:38:17.112-05:00Thanks, Jake!Thanks, Jake!Paul Schmelzerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06876791601014759949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-14268868080769394102011-07-20T08:36:30.753-05:002011-07-20T08:36:30.753-05:00A moving story, Paul, a thousand thanks for this.A moving story, Paul, a thousand thanks for this.Erik Brandthttp://typografika.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4073789.post-22054122834133106082011-07-20T08:30:37.704-05:002011-07-20T08:30:37.704-05:00Loved reading this. ThanksLoved reading this. ThanksJakehttp://abstract.nassassin.comnoreply@blogger.com